1. Subject identification
Name (as given): “Doc Tommy”
Possible legal name: Thomas Caravello (unconfirmed)
Other names collected:
“Tommy the Tooth”; “Dr. T”; “The Accountant”; “Tommy C.”; “T. Car.” (initials on prescription pad)
2. Background & personal history
Age: Mid‑50s (approx.)
Residence: North Jersey
Marital status: Divorced
Client relationship: Former spouse
Client concerns:
Hidden income; undeclared assets; “strange visitors”; “too many ledgers for a dentist.”
3. Professional status
Occupation: Dentist (self‑reported, supported by observation)
Training:
No dental school record under Caravello or any variant. One diploma in office under name “Anthony Delvecchio” (photo resembles subject if you tilt your head). Several sources claim he “learned dentistry inside.” One neighbor claims he apprenticed under a retired dentist.
4. Office observations
Condition: Outdated but clean
Equipment: Old but functional
Notable items:
Sportsbook ledgers on dental chair; money‑counting machines on back counter; paper files stacked in geological layers; a safe that hums; a poster about gum disease from the 1990s.
5. Financial analysis
Income sources:
Dental work (confirmed); cash transactions unrelated to dentistry (frequent); ledger entries inconsistent with dental billing.
Patterns:
Cash flow higher than expected; irregular deposits; several individuals arriving after midnight.
6. Associates & contacts
Observed:
Men connected to local gambling networks; a driver (identity unknown); several non‑patient visitors; possible indirect connection to DeAngelo family (unconfirmed).
7. Behavioral profile
General demeanor:
Polite; quiet; works long hours; comfortable with blood; comfortable with cash; comfortable with silence.
8. Summary
Subject operates a legitimate dental practice and a parallel cash‑based operation. Identity uncertain. Last name uncertain. Training unclear. Income irregular. Client’s concerns partially substantiated.
ADDENDUM — CONTRACTOR STATUS
Filed by Shen OfficeInvestigator: H. Callahan, Inspector
Status: Unavailable for follow‑up
Contractor completed initial deliverable. Follow‑up inquiries were scheduled but not conducted. Contractor is no longer reachable.
Last voicemail referenced “a couple of things that don’t add up.” Phone disconnected shortly after. Email bounced. Mail returned. No missing‑person report filed. No emergency contacts listed.